Consumer RightsExpense AccountMutual FundsPersonal FinanceJune 6, 2017by Monika Halan0Why we stick with SIPs and not endowment plans
A natural experiment comparing Sebi and IRDAI on how regulation can make or break a market.
A natural experiment comparing Sebi and IRDAI on how regulation can make or break a market.
IRDAI may allow life insurance policies to port from one company to another. But before this is allowed, the industry needs deep structural changes.
The insurance regulator responded to my column with a 7 page letter. I use their main argument and rebut it in this piece.
To unpack the issues around a regulatory regime that rests its consumer protection thought on 'suitability', NIPFP organised a half day Round Table in August 2016. Highlights of the discussion.
IRDAI goes three steps back in consumer protection
In a market with falling costs, the Indian insurance regulator hikes agent compensation. Formalises what were earlier illegal payouts.
Life insurance IPOs are here. Good for the market as big issues add depth. Good for third party scrutiny on the stock market of insurance firms.
It needs regulatory change for systemic mis-selling to stop. Just one bank firing two people won't do.
Regulators were in denial about mis-selling. I went out and got the evidence that they mis-sell. Terribly.
Government securities go retail. RBi sets up household finance committee and IRDA accepts that banks mis-sell.